GP essay time
February 2, 2010 at 9:24 pm 19 comments
31/50, bitches. That means I can pon(skip) my GP lectures. Or at least, that’s what I say to myself. The following essay has been cleaned up for spelling and grammar but no sentences have been changed majorly.
To what extent are our perceptions manipulated by the media? This is a hard question to fully answer, requiring one to sieve the tangled and fine web of relationships between people and the media. However, it is in my viewpoint that our perceptions, by and large, are consciously and subconsciously influenced by the media.
Firstly, the word “manipulation” implies an active role played by the media in changing perceptions. However, sometimes the case is that a person can also be influenced by the hidden bias in the media. Therefore that will be included as well. The media refers to any medium where information and new knowledge can be spread to the masses, including new media like video sharing and podcasting in addition to more traditional media like television and newspapers.
How can the media manipulate our perceptions? It can do so by giving us information intended to change our opinions of events or objects. Branding is one such example. Babies of over a year old are able to recognize fast food chain logos even before they learn to speak. That means that even before a child learn to order a burger, he will associate Ronald Mcdonald with fast food.
Everywhere we go, we are inundated with ads that tell us, subtly or not, that “Brand XX” has certain desirable qualities that we should crave. Without the information given by the media, we would be quite clueless on which brand to choose. In an experiment done by a university, subjects were given unlabeled drink cans which contained Coca-cola and Pepsi, When asked which of the drinks they preferred, the results were largely neutral and arbitrary. However, once information was given on which drink was Coke and Pepsi, a majority chose Coke due to a positive perception of “flavour”. This tells us that the human brain can made to anticipate quality in well-known brands(though the quality may or may not exist). This also demonstrates quite clearly the powerful effect that the media can have on our perceptions.

Stole this from Yeeloo’s tumblr. I’m a great fan of tighhighs, unless you have fat legs. >:(Hit the jump to continue reading)
The media, by itself, should solely be a conduit for information. However, because of various agendas wether political, social or religious, the media can and has become a manipulator of wills. In America, Evangelical Christianity is a big business, with television channels and radio stations dedicated to winning over believers. Thousands join every year and new churches are built that rival malls and have amenities such as swimming pools and tennis courts. Religion is a lifestyle choice and a deeply personal one at that. The ability of the media to change this is a testament to its power. Smaller religious denominations make use of the media too, but typically on a smaller scale. They do so through the use of community media and online media such as newsletters and Youtube. An example of more insidious usage would be terrorist cell groups like those of Al-Qaeda, notorious for extremist preaching online through the use of essays posted on Islamic forums and videos denouncing the West.
However, the media is not always an active manipulator. Sometimes it can change our perceptions passively as well. The news is a good example. News worthy items are usually negative and whenever we open up the newspaper we get an extremely bleak picture of the world. Instead of Jane Goodlady helping orphans, we read about Joe the Banker causing the collapse of financial systems around the world. We have come to expect a world that can only get worse and that is because of the hidden bias in news media. It is a hidden manipulation but manipulation nonetheless. [Teacher's note: Because bad news sells]
By now, the media can be seen as an evil puppet master, changing our views, forming our opinions for us. But it is not all that bad. The people still have a freedom of choice. Most niche media will hardly be looked at by other people from other factions. You will not expect a Democrat to watch Fox News. Furthernore, as a consumer, we can choose, by being educated for example, to make informed choices about our products instead of falling prey to advertisements or other persuasive media.
The media is a powerful tool to inform and empower. It can also be used to manipulate people to achieve certain aims. Even though we can raise our consciousness against such attempts we still still be under bombardment by the numerous viewpoints the media wants us to take as our own and inevitably a few will succeed in changing us. From that we can see that our perceptions are indeed manipulated by the media to a large extent.
Entry filed under: Life. Tags: GP, the media is bad!!, writings.
1. noob | February 2, 2010 at 9:35 pm
Kinky Thighhighs 4ever, whoohoo!
sorry that i find the hosiery more interesting than your essay
2. insanejake | February 3, 2010 at 5:50 pm
Never mind, it’s a school assignment so what I wrote was just some bullshit. I find it to be finely written bullshit though.
3. noob | February 3, 2010 at 9:37 pm
“Babies of over a year old are able to recognize fast food chain logos even before they learn to speak.”
er…are yous sure? seriously?
4. insanejake | February 3, 2010 at 9:55 pm
That one was actually exaggerated. Greatly. Remember supersize me? Kids knew who Ronald Macdonald was but not Jesus or George Bush so I just went with that.
The Coke one is absolutely true though, although Yong Zhi disagrees with me and says studies show the opposite. I think he maybe a pepsi fan boy though.
5. noob | February 4, 2010 at 10:07 am
Yongzhi just likes to disagree with conventional opinion for the sake of doing so, it’s called “pretentious arts student syndrome”
If you really want to tell the diff, open a bottle, the carbonation is considerably stronger in coke than pepsi.
6. ts | February 5, 2010 at 3:31 pm
haha walau. I was so engrossed in your essay, then the picture suddenly appeared. HAHA.
Anyway, I find your essay very interesting!! Still say it’s bullshit walau. I wanna write like u. 偶像。
7. Noob | February 5, 2010 at 8:06 pm
i sense sarcasm in the comment above.
due to repeated use of Walau and HAHA
8. yz | February 6, 2010 at 12:06 am
panjie, you disagree with conventional opinion too. quite often in fact. for example, you dont like the beatles because almost everyone likes them.does that make you a “pretentious arts student”? or worse still, hypocritical?. do you even realise the irony of your own statement when you called me “pretentious” just because i was an arts student. and read clearly. i have not “pretentiously” disagreed with conventional opinion just for the sake of doing so, you’re just saying that to put me down. if you read carefully, i merely stated that there have been blind taste tests that show that people prefer pepsi. this is supported by the Pepsi Challenge. though the test has it flaws, it is, at least, an example of showing people liking pepsi better. i have substantiated my case. you just dismissively accused me of being a pretentious arts student. true, i do disagree with conventional opinion from time to time, but i do so for personal or logical reasons, not for “the sake of doing so”. what i have done here is just to point out to jake that there have been tests showing that a majority of people preferring pepsi to coke, which runs contrary to what he said in his essay. and jake, what made you think that i was most likely a “pepsi fanboy”? what i did was to just state a fact that such a study with the aforementioned results did exist. it is not something i cooked up to “support” my “undying love for pepsi” to fulfill my “pretentious” urges to be nonconformist to the mainstream just for the sake of doing so. that is akin to remarking that i like the shining sun just because i said that the sun is shining outside. and for those reading this, i would like to state here that i prefer Coke to Pepsi. it has more bite compared to pepsi, and for that i prefer Coke. not because i suffer from “pretentious arts student syndrome”. and that, too, does not mean that i am a “coke fanboy”. lets hope that your accusations of me as suffering from “pretentious arts student syndrome” will not degenerate into something worse from further conflict. Like calling me a “pepsi fanboy”.
9. noob | February 6, 2010 at 12:39 pm
Touche.
But seriously, everybody suffers from lapses of “pretentious arts student syndrome” and it is never for personal or logical reasons, like a liking for nirvana’s music, do not honestly claim to understand what the song is saying, do you like it beyond anything greater than a very nice rhythm.
Do you dare to honestly claim that a hatred for taylor swift and lady gaga and etc arises out of purely personal reasons and not even partially from a desire to be nonconformist?
Shit, i know that i am not immune to the lure of non-conformism and i see that you are not either. Everything that we do is affected by our own desire to be unique, and that applies to everyone, its a matter of whether you are willing to admit it.
The pretentious arts student syndrome is just a catchy way of justifying your comment, i am not claiming innocence of it.
Sorry Jake for using your blog as a platform for bitter debate
10. insanejake | February 6, 2010 at 1:55 pm
Never mind, I like my blog to have life now and then. Before you guys started coming and commenting it was dead.
In terms of pacing though, I will say Pan Jie has the upper hand solely because he uses paragraphing.
11. yz | February 6, 2010 at 6:22 pm
i don’t suffer from pretentious arts student syndrome. well maybe that’s you, not me. in this case you define music to be likable for me because it has a “nice rhythm”. whether i like a song or not has got many other reasons. music has so much more to offer. your narrow minded reasons for liking a song do not apply to me. and i can honestly claim to know what a song is saying. most songs by Nirvana have a meaning behind them. I like nirvana because they make music that appeals to me. its a personal reason. like why tsangsheng likes stefanie sun. is that conformist of him wanting to do so?
and liking Nirvana isn’t non conformist. Nirvana have millions of fans worldwide even though Kurt Cobain has been dead for over a decade. how is that “being non-conformist” at all? i dont get you.
this being one of your many wrong assumptions you make in your argument to claim that i am non conformist just for the sake of it, i also have to comment on “Do you dare to honestly claim that a hatred for taylor swift and lady gaga and etc”. one. I don’t hate taylor swift and lady gaga. the music they make just does not happen to fall under the category of songs i like. take the case of lady gaga. in my spare time, i don’t like to listen to dance/electropop music. and i find taylor swifts earlier compositions not bad actually. oh no. does that make me “conformist”? i like Green Day, a mainstream band by today’s standards too. doesn’t that make me conformist, going by your argument?
So going by your logic, if I dislike a certain aspect of mainstream music, it is due to, or partially due to the fact that i suffer from “pretentious arts student syndrome”. and therefore it is impossible for me to not dislike something because i dislike the music itself? and so thus, im just a pretentious arts student?
i do admit that there is a certain attraction in being non-conformist. For me, its fun to try new things outside of the mainstream, things that are not being played on the radio 24/7. your reason of “Everything that we do is affected by our own desire to be unique” perhaps only applies to you. everybody is unique in their tastes and likings. i dont see why , according to you, people have to go all out to show and prove that they are unique, and that “that applies to everyone, its a matter of whether you are willing to admit it.” thats like saying everyone has a potential to become gay, and thats just a matter of whether they are willing to admit it. you just tag people with your own world viewpoint of their so called desire to be unique, and erroneously applied it to me as well. taking the high moral ground of admitting that you are such a person who is non conformist for the sake of it doesn’t cut the ice either. just because you are like this doesn’t mean people are.
as to saying that i suffer from pretentious arts syndrome was just a “catchy way” of putting it, i had no idea that insults could be defined as “catchy”. And if it contains unjustified and harmful connotations, i dont see how it can be justified to explain comments. its just a way to put people down.
one last question, what do you mean that you are “not claiming innocence of it.”? i dont know what that means.
oh and ghim yeow, “In terms of pacing though, I will say Pan Jie has the upper hand solely because he uses paragraphing.”
that doesnt mean anything. its like saying in terms of wealth, panjie is richer than me because he has one more dollar. and pacing doesnt make for a better argument anyway.
12. insanejake | February 6, 2010 at 7:42 pm
No. My comment is more like saying that Panjie is more attractive than Yongzhi because he wears shiny shoes.
When a tree falls in a forest and nobody hears it does it make a sound? Similarly, if you make a good argument but nobody sees it because its a huge wall of text, is it still a good one?
13. noob | February 6, 2010 at 8:49 pm
Not claiming innocence means that i suffer form ‘Non-conformism for the sake of it’ syndrome as well. Anybody less than a saint does so more or less, that’s what i say.
I don’t think that paragraphing and pacing is only worth one dollar,
but then you’re using paragraphing now so you’re already admitting the merits of paragraphing.
Lets settle this argument when we meet, instead of subjecting everyone’s blog for the defense of our egos.
14. yz | February 6, 2010 at 11:02 pm
same analogy. as to your second you have misused it because a strength of the argument is not based on how it looks. thats like saying a gun works well cause its pretty.
as to pj saying that “Anybody less than a saint does so more or less, that’s what i say.” well it seems that you think that everyone has the urge to go all out to show and prove that they are unique. im not going to argue with that. thats your viewpoint. and since im not a saint, i am non conformist for its own sake.
and its just an analogy la, i didnt say paragraphing is worth one dollar. it was just to illustrate the inane nature of jakes comment, which he supplied with another that “that Panjie is more attractive than Yongzhi because he wears shiny shoes.”
by using paragraphing, my intention was not to admit the merits of paragraphing, but rather just to make it easier for you guys to read it. i didnt say say paragraphing made for a better argument.
last of all , you have diverted the argument to such minor and petty things.that doesnt change the fact that you insulted me by saying i suffer from “pretentious arts student syndrome”. this doesnt make the cause for your wild accusations any better. im not defending my ego here, just trying to correct an unjustified viewpoint you might cause others to have of me.
15. ts | February 7, 2010 at 12:13 am
CHILL.
To jake, next time don’t put sexy pic halfway through your essay. look what happened.
16. insanejake | February 7, 2010 at 5:55 pm
LOL it’s not the sexy pic fault. Also it’s not that sexy.
17. yz | February 7, 2010 at 6:58 pm
lol@ boobs and anime stuff. yeah you should just put a link on this blog to ur anime stuff.
18. Anon | February 19, 2010 at 2:40 am
FFS wall of texts, Ow me brains
19. 2010 in review « You’re imagining this blog | January 3, 2011 at 12:32 pm
[...] GP essay time February 201018 comments 5 [...]